[BETA] Arena Football vs World War 3

[BETA] Arena Football currently leads with 80 concurrent players against 44, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to World War 3 at 129 concurrent players, versus 102. Momentum favours [BETA] Arena Football: +21.2% week over week versus -33.8% for World War 3. Lifetime, World War 3 has more visits (27.1M vs 7.6M). Full side-by-side history for [BETA] Arena Football and World War 3 is charted above.

[BETA] Arena Football
80
playing now
97 24h peak · 7.6M visits
VS
World War 3
44
playing now
77 24h peak · 27.1M visits

Player count history

[BETA] Arena FootballWorld War 3

Head to head

Metric [BETA] Arena Football World War 3Difference
Playing now804436 (1.8×)
24h peak977720
24h average53494
7-day peak97943
7-day average40499
30-day peak97943
All-time peak10212927
24h change 82.8% 2.0%
7d change 21.2% 33.8%
Total visits7.6M27.1M19.6M (3.6×)
Visits (24h)5.2K6.4K1.2K
Visits (7d)46.6K46.8K202
Favorites6.8K1.8M1.7M (257.3×)
Rating78.3%59.6%
Global rank (players)#3,868#4,301of 7,662
Trending score36.00.0
CreatedJan 5, 2019Jun 29, 2025
GenreSports & RacingStrategy

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for [BETA] Arena Football, 10 for World War 3.

[BETA] Arena Football vs World War 3 — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals