Expedition Antarctica vs Build to Survive

Build to Survive currently leads with 4,836 concurrent players against 3,192, a 1.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 5,374. Lifetime, Expedition Antarctica has more visits (696.5M vs 404.9M). Full side-by-side history for Expedition Antarctica and Build to Survive is charted above.

🚩Expedition Antarctica
3,192
playing now
5,374 24h peak · 696.5M visits
VS
Build to Survive 🛠️
4,836
playing now
6,607 24h peak · 404.9M visits

Player count history

Expedition AntarcticaBuild to Survive

Head to head

Metric Expedition Antarctica Build to SurviveDifference
Playing now3,1924,8361,644 (1.5×)
24h peak5,3746,6071,233
24h average3,9015,1851,284
7-day peak5,3746,7441,370
7-day average3,2735,2451,972 (1.6×)
30-day peak5,3746,7441,370
All-time peak5,3746,7441,370
24h change 33.5% 0.5%
7d change
Total visits696.5M404.9M291.6M (1.7×)
Visits (24h)410.3K502K91.8K
Visits (7d)1.2M1.2M19.4K
Favorites1.9M10.9M9M (5.9×)
Rating86.0%96.2%
Global rank (players)#487#321of 4,278
Trending score68.4-4.2
CreatedDec 30, 2018Feb 12, 2021
GenreAdventureSurvival

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Expedition Antarctica, 3 for Build to Survive.

Expedition Antarctica vs Build to Survive — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals