Horrific Housing vs Jump for Cases

Horrific Housing currently leads with 2,317 concurrent players against 1,229, a 1.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Jump for Cases at 8,801 concurrent players, versus 4,143. Lifetime, Horrific Housing has more visits (713.9M vs 3M). Full side-by-side history for Horrific Housing and Jump for Cases is charted above.

Horrific Housing
2,317
playing now
3,282 24h peak · 713.9M visits
VS
Jump for Cases
1,229
playing now
5,816 24h peak · 3M visits

Player count history

Horrific HousingJump for Cases

Head to head

Metric Horrific Housing Jump for CasesDifference
Playing now2,3171,2291,088 (1.9×)
24h peak3,2825,8162,534 (1.8×)
24h average2,4561,3911,065 (1.8×)
7-day peak4,1435,8161,673
7-day average2,6391,4371,202 (1.8×)
30-day peak4,1435,8161,673
All-time peak4,1438,8014,658 (2.1×)
24h change 3.3% 41.3%
7d change
Total visits713.9M3M710.9M (235.6×)
Visits (24h)232.1K141.2K90.9K (1.6×)
Visits (7d)1.1M558.5K525.8K (1.9×)
Favorites2M94.4K1.9M (20.8×)
Rating78.2%97.6%
Global rank (players)#676#1,181of 4,743
Trending score-23.3-9.9
CreatedJun 27, 2015May 14, 2026
GenreSurvivalSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Horrific Housing, 4 for Jump for Cases.

Horrific Housing vs Jump for Cases — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals