Horrific Housing vs [] Catch And Tame!
[] Catch And Tame! currently leads with 7,742 concurrent players against 3,030, a 2.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [] Catch And Tame! at 18,254 concurrent players, versus 4,143. Lifetime, Horrific Housing has more visits (713.8M vs 433M). Full side-by-side history for Horrific Housing and [] Catch And Tame! is charted above.
Horrific Housing
3,030
playing now
3,282 24h peak · 713.8M visits
VS
[🦞] Catch And Tame!
7,742
playing now
16,935 24h peak · 433M visits
Player count history
Horrific Housing[] Catch And Tame!
Head to head
| Metric | Horrific Housing | [] Catch And Tame! | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 3,030 | 7,742 | 4,712 (2.6×) |
| 24h peak | 3,282 | 16,935 | 13,653 (5.2×) |
| 24h average | 2,596 | 11,091 | 8,495 (4.3×) |
| 7-day peak | 4,143 | 17,063 | 12,920 (4.1×) |
| 7-day average | 2,664 | 12,022 | 9,358 (4.5×) |
| 30-day peak | 4,143 | 17,063 | 12,920 (4.1×) |
| All-time peak | 4,143 | 18,254 | 14,111 (4.4×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 8.8% | ▼ 7.5% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 713.8M | 433M | 280.9M (1.6×) |
| Visits (24h) | 229.7K | 1.2M | 1M (5.4×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1M | 5.2M | 4.2M (5.0×) |
| Favorites | 2M | 1.2M | 725.2K (1.6×) |
| Rating | 78.2% | 98.1% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #622 | #218 | of 4,743 |
| Trending score | -8.6 | -31.3 | — |
| Created | Jun 27, 2015 | Nov 2, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Horrific Housing, 5 for [] Catch And Tame!.