Horrific Housing vs Build a Soccer Team
Horrific Housing currently leads with 2,848 concurrent players against 1,113, a 2.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build a Soccer Team at 4,254 concurrent players, versus 4,143. Momentum favours Build a Soccer Team: +15.5% week over week versus -15.9% for Horrific Housing. Lifetime, Horrific Housing has more visits (715M vs 5M). Full side-by-side history for Horrific Housing and Build a Soccer Team is charted above.
Horrific Housing
2,848
playing now
2,975 24h peak · 715M visits
VS
Build a Soccer Team [🎲]
1,113
playing now
1,256 24h peak · 5M visits
Player count history
Horrific HousingBuild a Soccer Team
Head to head
| Metric | Horrific Housing | Build a Soccer Team | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,848 | 1,113 | 1,735 (2.6×) |
| 24h peak | 2,975 | 1,256 | 1,719 (2.4×) |
| 24h average | 2,297 | 1,059 | 1,238 (2.2×) |
| 7-day peak | 3,407 | 4,093 | 686 |
| 7-day average | 2,285 | 1,126 | 1,159 (2.0×) |
| 30-day peak | 4,143 | 4,093 | 50 |
| All-time peak | 4,143 | 4,254 | 111 |
| 24h change | ▲ 8.7% | ▼ 5.1% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 15.9% | ▲ 15.5% | — |
| Total visits | 715M | 5M | 710M (144.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 209.1K | 93.8K | 115.3K (2.2×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.6M | 763K | 864.5K (2.1×) |
| Favorites | 2M | 8.5K | 2M (231.5×) |
| Rating | 78.2% | 96.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #574 | #1,222 | of 7,127 |
| Trending score | 1.8 | -17.6 | — |
| Created | Jun 27, 2015 | Jun 27, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for Horrific Housing, 10 for Build a Soccer Team.