Horrific Housing vs Bendy and the ink Machine
Bendy and the ink Machine currently leads with 4,120 concurrent players against 1,635, a 2.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Bendy and the ink Machine at 5,690 concurrent players, versus 4,143. Lifetime, Horrific Housing has more visits (713.7M vs 216.5M). Full side-by-side history for Horrific Housing and Bendy and the ink Machine is charted above.
Horrific Housing
1,635
playing now
2,967 24h peak · 713.7M visits
VS
Bendy and the ink Machine
4,120
playing now
5,585 24h peak · 216.5M visits
Player count history
Horrific HousingBendy and the ink Machine
Head to head
| Metric | Horrific Housing | Bendy and the ink Machine | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,635 | 4,120 | 2,485 (2.5×) |
| 24h peak | 2,967 | 5,585 | 2,618 (1.9×) |
| 24h average | 2,113 | 4,541 | 2,428 (2.1×) |
| 7-day peak | 4,143 | 5,690 | 1,547 |
| 7-day average | 2,578 | 4,577 | 1,999 (1.8×) |
| 30-day peak | 4,143 | 5,690 | 1,547 |
| All-time peak | 4,143 | 5,690 | 1,547 |
| 24h change | ▼ 11.9% | ▼ 3.1% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 713.7M | 216.5M | 497.2M (3.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 233.7K | 432.7K | 199K (1.9×) |
| Visits (7d) | 927.3K | 1.2M | 273.5K |
| Favorites | 2M | 239.7K | 1.7M (8.2×) |
| Rating | 78.2% | 81.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #891 | #367 | of 4,424 |
| Trending score | -59.4 | -2.9 | — |
| Created | Jun 27, 2015 | Apr 3, 2020 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Action | — |
Other comparisons
Horrific Housing vs Escape Papa Pizza's Pizzeria! (SCARY OBBY)Horrific Housing vs [Pokemon Brick Bronze] [Roria Conquest]Horrific Housing vs Merge a TankHorrific Housing vs Clean Your KeycapsHorrific Housing vs [STYLES!] TNT Voxel PlaygroundHorrific Housing vs Dudes BattlegroundsCompare two other games →
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Horrific Housing, 4 for Bendy and the ink Machine.