[GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing vs TPS: Street Soccer

[GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing currently leads with 1,543 concurrent players against 367, a 4.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing at 4,143 concurrent players, versus 1,320. Momentum favours TPS: Street Soccer: -15.2% week over week versus -19.5% for [GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing. Lifetime, TPS: Street Soccer has more visits (789.9M vs 715.3M). Full side-by-side history for [GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing and TPS: Street Soccer is charted above.

[GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing
1,543
playing now
2,881 24h peak · 715.3M visits
VS
TPS: Street Soccer 🏆
367
playing now
1,073 24h peak · 789.9M visits

Player count history

[GAMEMODE] Horrific HousingTPS: Street Soccer

Head to head

Metric [GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing TPS: Street SoccerDifference
Playing now1,5433671,176 (4.2×)
24h peak2,8811,0731,808 (2.7×)
24h average1,8786191,259 (3.0×)
7-day peak3,4071,3202,087 (2.6×)
7-day average2,1207591,361 (2.8×)
30-day peak4,1431,3202,823 (3.1×)
All-time peak4,1431,3202,823 (3.1×)
24h change 6.9% 6.4%
7d change 19.5% 15.2%
Total visits715.3M789.9M74.6M
Visits (24h)219.3K94.1K125.2K (2.3×)
Visits (7d)1.6M706.2K894.9K (2.3×)
Favorites2M659.9K1.3M (3.0×)
Rating78.2%74.7%
Global rank (players)#981#2,388of 7,707
Trending score-37.0-50.0
CreatedJun 27, 2015Dec 23, 2015
GenreSurvivalSports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for [GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing, 12 for TPS: Street Soccer.