Horrific Housing vs 3008 [2.74]

3008 [2.74] currently leads with 16,392 concurrent players against 3,162, a 5.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to 3008 [2.74] at 19,045 concurrent players, versus 4,143. Lifetime, 3008 [2.74] has more visits (3.3B vs 713.8M). Full side-by-side history for Horrific Housing and 3008 [2.74] is charted above.

Horrific Housing
3,162
playing now
3,150 24h peak · 713.8M visits
VS
3008 [2.74]
16,392
playing now
17,977 24h peak · 3.3B visits

Player count history

Horrific Housing3008 [2.74]

Head to head

Metric Horrific Housing 3008 [2.74]Difference
Playing now3,16216,39213,230 (5.2×)
24h peak3,15017,97714,827 (5.7×)
24h average2,55815,54512,987 (6.1×)
7-day peak4,14319,04514,902 (4.6×)
7-day average2,65613,47410,818 (5.1×)
30-day peak4,14319,04514,902 (4.6×)
All-time peak4,14319,04514,902 (4.6×)
24h change 6.5% 3.2%
7d change
Total visits713.8M3.3B2.6B (4.6×)
Visits (24h)228.4K1M797.4K (4.5×)
Visits (7d)1M4M3M (3.9×)
Favorites2M5.7M3.8M (2.9×)
Rating78.2%91.7%
Global rank (players)#631#108of 4,743
Trending score-12.564.3
CreatedJun 27, 2015Jan 20, 2019
GenreSurvivalSurvival

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Horrific Housing, 5 for 3008 [2.74].

Horrific Housing vs 3008 [2.74] — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals