Horrific Housing vs Eat the World

Eat the World currently leads with 3,673 concurrent players against 3,022. On all-time peak the record belongs to Eat the World at 5,261 concurrent players, versus 4,143. Lifetime, Horrific Housing has more visits (713.8M vs 615.8M). Full side-by-side history for Horrific Housing and Eat the World is charted above.

Horrific Housing
3,022
playing now
3,101 24h peak · 713.8M visits
VS
Eat the World
3,673
playing now
4,969 24h peak · 615.8M visits

Player count history

Horrific HousingEat the World

Head to head

Metric Horrific Housing Eat the WorldDifference
Playing now3,0223,673651
24h peak3,1014,9691,868 (1.6×)
24h average2,4813,9111,430 (1.6×)
7-day peak4,1435,2401,097
7-day average2,6423,8441,202
30-day peak4,1435,2401,097
All-time peak4,1435,2611,118
24h change 1.9% 4.2%
7d change
Total visits713.8M615.8M98M
Visits (24h)227.3K397.1K169.8K (1.7×)
Visits (7d)1M1.7M656.3K (1.6×)
Favorites2M27.8M25.8M (14.1×)
Rating78.2%94.7%
Global rank (players)#604#497of 4,743
Trending score-20.56.2
CreatedJun 27, 2015Feb 22, 2024
GenreSurvivalSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Horrific Housing, 5 for Eat the World.

Horrific Housing vs Eat the World — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals