Horrific Housing vs ABA

ABA currently leads with 6,355 concurrent players against 3,094, a 2.1× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to ABA at 7,226 concurrent players, versus 4,143. Lifetime, ABA has more visits (1.3B vs 713.8M). Full side-by-side history for Horrific Housing and ABA is charted above.

Horrific Housing
3,094
playing now
3,101 24h peak · 713.8M visits
VS
ABA
6,355
playing now
7,226 24h peak · 1.3B visits

Player count history

Horrific HousingABA

Head to head

Metric Horrific Housing ABADifference
Playing now3,0946,3553,261 (2.1×)
24h peak3,1017,2264,125 (2.3×)
24h average2,4675,6793,212 (2.3×)
7-day peak4,1437,2263,083 (1.7×)
7-day average2,6405,4432,803 (2.1×)
30-day peak4,1437,2263,083 (1.7×)
All-time peak4,1437,2263,083 (1.7×)
24h change 1.3% 12.2%
7d change
Total visits713.8M1.3B592.2M (1.8×)
Visits (24h)224.8K464.5K239.7K (2.1×)
Visits (7d)1M1.8M822.9K (1.8×)
Favorites2M1M966.4K (2.0×)
Rating78.2%80.8%
Global rank (players)#605#281of 4,743
Trending score-22.016.2
CreatedJun 27, 2015Feb 25, 2018
GenreSurvivalAction

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Horrific Housing, 5 for ABA.

Horrific Housing vs ABA — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals