[GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing vs [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG

[GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing currently leads with 2,567 concurrent players against 2,238. On all-time peak the record belongs to [GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing at 4,143 concurrent players, versus 3,249. Momentum favours [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG: +6.2% week over week versus -16.8% for [GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing. Lifetime, [GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing has more visits (715.4M vs 24.8M). Full side-by-side history for [GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing and [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG is charted above.

[GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing
2,567
playing now
2,793 24h peak · 715.4M visits
VS
[⛈️THUNDERSTORM]🎲 EMOTE RNG
2,238
playing now
2,773 24h peak · 24.8M visits

Player count history

[GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing[THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG

Head to head

Metric [GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNGDifference
Playing now2,5672,238329
24h peak2,7932,77320
24h average2,2731,282991 (1.8×)
7-day peak3,4072,773634
7-day average2,1936691,524 (3.3×)
30-day peak4,1432,7731,370
All-time peak4,1433,249894
24h change 9.0% 218.9%
7d change 16.8% 6.2%
Total visits715.4M24.8M690.7M (28.9×)
Visits (24h)205.2K48.8K156.4K (4.2×)
Visits (7d)1.6M299.6K1.3M (5.3×)
Favorites2M37.6K1.9M (52.4×)
Rating78.2%88.2%
Global rank (players)#726#760of 7,866
Trending score12.1274.8
CreatedJun 27, 2015Aug 1, 2025
GenreSurvivalSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for [GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing, 12 for [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG.