Horrific Housing vs Jump To Steal Slime
Jump To Steal Slime currently leads with 2,818 concurrent players against 1,588, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Jump To Steal Slime at 5,607 concurrent players, versus 4,143. Momentum favours Jump To Steal Slime: -10.5% week over week versus -19.0% for Horrific Housing. Lifetime, Horrific Housing has more visits (715.1M vs 16.8M). Full side-by-side history for Horrific Housing and Jump To Steal Slime is charted above.
Horrific Housing
1,588
playing now
2,889 24h peak · 715.1M visits
VS
Jump To Steal Slime 🟢
2,818
playing now
3,310 24h peak · 16.8M visits
Player count history
Horrific HousingJump To Steal Slime
Head to head
| Metric | Horrific Housing | Jump To Steal Slime | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,588 | 2,818 | 1,230 (1.8×) |
| 24h peak | 2,889 | 3,310 | 421 |
| 24h average | 1,956 | 2,732 | 776 |
| 7-day peak | 3,407 | 3,533 | 126 |
| 7-day average | 2,195 | 2,374 | 179 |
| 30-day peak | 4,143 | 3,533 | 610 |
| All-time peak | 4,143 | 5,607 | 1,464 |
| 24h change | ▼ 7.4% | ▲ 44.9% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 19.0% | ▼ 10.5% | — |
| Total visits | 715.1M | 16.8M | 698.3M (42.6×) |
| Visits (24h) | 209.7K | 239.9K | 30.2K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.6M | 1.7M | 89.3K |
| Favorites | 2M | 794K | 1.2M (2.5×) |
| Rating | 78.2% | 83.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #774 | #460 | of 7,213 |
| Trending score | -35.5 | 51.3 | — |
| Created | Jun 27, 2015 | Jun 6, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Horrific Housing, 10 for Jump To Steal Slime.