Horrific Housing vs FNAF: Eternal Nights
FNAF: Eternal Nights currently leads with 5,587 concurrent players against 2,486, a 2.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FNAF: Eternal Nights at 5,983 concurrent players, versus 4,143. Lifetime, Horrific Housing has more visits (713.7M vs 313.3M). Full side-by-side history for Horrific Housing and FNAF: Eternal Nights is charted above.
Horrific Housing
2,486
playing now
2,967 24h peak · 713.7M visits
VS
FNAF: Eternal Nights 🍕
5,587
playing now
5,832 24h peak · 313.3M visits
Player count history
Horrific HousingFNAF: Eternal Nights
Head to head
| Metric | Horrific Housing | FNAF: Eternal Nights | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,486 | 5,587 | 3,101 (2.2×) |
| 24h peak | 2,967 | 5,832 | 2,865 (2.0×) |
| 24h average | 2,396 | 4,662 | 2,266 (1.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 4,143 | 5,983 | 1,840 |
| 7-day average | 2,658 | 4,406 | 1,748 (1.7×) |
| 30-day peak | 4,143 | 5,983 | 1,840 |
| All-time peak | 4,143 | 5,983 | 1,840 |
| 24h change | ▲ 13.0% | ▲ 48.2% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 713.7M | 313.3M | 400.4M (2.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 225.2K | 533.9K | 308.7K (2.4×) |
| Visits (7d) | 867.3K | 1.9M | 1M (2.2×) |
| Favorites | 2M | 837.1K | 1.1M (2.3×) |
| Rating | 78.2% | 94.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #695 | #294 | of 4,381 |
| Trending score | -33.0 | 21.2 | — |
| Created | Jun 27, 2015 | Oct 27, 2022 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Horrific Housing, 5 for FNAF: Eternal Nights.