[GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing vs Build a Football Squad
[GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing currently leads with 2,359 concurrent players against 770, a 3.1× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing at 4,143 concurrent players, versus 948. Momentum favours Build a Football Squad: +57.6% week over week versus -17.7% for [GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing. Lifetime, [GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing has more visits (715.2M vs 2.3M). Full side-by-side history for [GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing and Build a Football Squad is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | [GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing | Build a Football Squad | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,359 | 770 | 1,589 (3.1×) |
| 24h peak | 2,889 | 795 | 2,094 (3.6×) |
| 24h average | 2,094 | 569 | 1,525 (3.7×) |
| 7-day peak | 3,407 | 948 | 2,459 (3.6×) |
| 7-day average | 2,200 | 550 | 1,650 (4.0×) |
| 30-day peak | 4,143 | 948 | 3,195 (4.4×) |
| All-time peak | 4,143 | 948 | 3,195 (4.4×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 1.3% | ▲ 8.4% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 17.7% | ▲ 57.6% | — |
| Total visits | 715.2M | 2.3M | 712.8M (308.9×) |
| Visits (24h) | 202.6K | 57.5K | 145K (3.5×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.6M | 491.6K | 1.1M (3.3×) |
| Favorites | 2M | 171.1K | 1.8M (11.5×) |
| Rating | 78.2% | 76.6% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #794 | #1,741 | of 7,381 |
| Trending score | -15.8 | 9.1 | — |
| Created | Jun 27, 2015 | Jun 15, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Sports & Racing | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for [GAMEMODE] Horrific Housing, 10 for Build a Football Squad.