Horrific Housing vs [UPD] Cut a Gem
Horrific Housing currently leads with 1,445 concurrent players against 795, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Horrific Housing at 4,143 concurrent players, versus 4,114. Momentum favours [UPD] Cut a Gem: -6.9% week over week versus -19.3% for Horrific Housing. Lifetime, Horrific Housing has more visits (715.1M vs 10.7M). Full side-by-side history for Horrific Housing and [UPD] Cut a Gem is charted above.
Horrific Housing
1,445
playing now
2,889 24h peak · 715.1M visits
VS
[🔥UPD] Cut a Gem
795
playing now
1,205 24h peak · 10.7M visits
Player count history
Horrific Housing[UPD] Cut a Gem
Head to head
| Metric | Horrific Housing | [UPD] Cut a Gem | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,445 | 795 | 650 (1.8×) |
| 24h peak | 2,889 | 1,205 | 1,684 (2.4×) |
| 24h average | 1,915 | 847 | 1,068 (2.3×) |
| 7-day peak | 3,407 | 3,476 | 69 |
| 7-day average | 2,187 | 1,405 | 782 (1.6×) |
| 30-day peak | 4,143 | 3,476 | 667 |
| All-time peak | 4,143 | 4,114 | 29 |
| 24h change | ▼ 9.3% | ▼ 33.0% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 19.3% | ▼ 6.9% | — |
| Total visits | 715.1M | 10.7M | 704.4M (67.0×) |
| Visits (24h) | 212.2K | 80K | 132.2K (2.7×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.6M | 951K | 673.1K (1.7×) |
| Favorites | 2M | 362.6K | 1.6M (5.4×) |
| Rating | 78.2% | 97.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #844 | #1,363 | of 7,213 |
| Trending score | -40.4 | -114.5 | — |
| Created | Jun 27, 2015 | May 23, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Horrific Housing, 11 for [UPD] Cut a Gem.