[Rivers] Rise of Nations vs [FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED

[FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED currently leads with 2,685 concurrent players against 1,043, a 2.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED at 6,225 concurrent players, versus 2,555. Momentum favours [Rivers] Rise of Nations: -1.9% week over week versus -12.6% for [FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED. Lifetime, [Rivers] Rise of Nations has more visits (308.2M vs 296.7M). Full side-by-side history for [Rivers] Rise of Nations and [FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED is charted above.

[Rivers] Rise of Nations
1,043
playing now
2,398 24h peak · 308.2M visits
VS
[🛡️FACTIONS🛡️] ENTRENCHED 🥀
2,685
playing now
5,474 24h peak · 296.7M visits

Player count history

[Rivers] Rise of Nations[FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED

Head to head

Metric [Rivers] Rise of Nations [FACTIONS] ENTRENCHEDDifference
Playing now1,0432,6851,642 (2.6×)
24h peak2,3985,4743,076 (2.3×)
24h average1,5233,7782,255 (2.5×)
7-day peak2,3985,4743,076 (2.3×)
7-day average1,5664,1312,565 (2.6×)
30-day peak2,3986,2253,827 (2.6×)
All-time peak2,5556,2253,670 (2.4×)
24h change 15.6% 12.9%
7d change 1.9% 12.6%
Total visits308.2M296.7M11.5M
Visits (24h)78.1K394.6K316.5K (5.1×)
Visits (7d)549.6K3M2.4M (5.4×)
Favorites645.9K2.4M1.8M (3.7×)
Rating87.2%92.2%
Global rank (players)#1,057#454of 8,338
Trending score-8.6-30.4
CreatedNov 14, 2018Aug 18, 2019
GenreStrategyShooter

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for [Rivers] Rise of Nations, 14 for [FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED.