[Rivers] Rise of Nations vs Lexington & Concord

[Rivers] Rise of Nations currently leads with 1,641 concurrent players against 1,044, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [Rivers] Rise of Nations at 2,098 concurrent players, versus 1,407. Lifetime, [Rivers] Rise of Nations has more visits (307.5M vs 38.1M). Full side-by-side history for [Rivers] Rise of Nations and Lexington & Concord is charted above.

[Rivers] Rise of Nations
1,641
playing now
2,098 24h peak · 307.5M visits
VS
Lexington & Concord
1,044
playing now
1,407 24h peak · 38.1M visits

Player count history

[Rivers] Rise of NationsLexington & Concord

Head to head

Metric [Rivers] Rise of Nations Lexington & ConcordDifference
Playing now1,6411,044597 (1.6×)
24h peak2,0981,407691
24h average1,6931,043650 (1.6×)
7-day peak2,0981,407691
7-day average1,552968584 (1.6×)
30-day peak2,0981,407691
All-time peak2,0981,407691
24h change 30.2% 6.6%
7d change
Total visits307.5M38.1M269.4M (8.1×)
Visits (24h)81K83.8K2.7K
Visits (7d)260.4K192.1K68.2K
Favorites645.3K173.8K471.5K (3.7×)
Rating87.2%86.7%
Global rank (players)#904#1,237of 4,380
Trending score28.922.8
CreatedNov 14, 2018Nov 5, 2023
GenreStrategyShooter

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for [Rivers] Rise of Nations, 4 for Lexington & Concord.

[Rivers] Rise of Nations vs Lexington & Concord — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals