[Rivers] Rise of Nations vs Be a Lucky Block

[Rivers] Rise of Nations currently leads with 1,905 concurrent players against 1,644. On all-time peak the record belongs to Be a Lucky Block at 2,231 concurrent players, versus 2,098. Lifetime, Be a Lucky Block has more visits (768.9M vs 307.5M). Full side-by-side history for [Rivers] Rise of Nations and Be a Lucky Block is charted above.

[Rivers] Rise of Nations
1,905
playing now
2,098 24h peak · 307.5M visits
VS
Be a Lucky Block
1,644
playing now
2,054 24h peak · 768.9M visits

Player count history

[Rivers] Rise of NationsBe a Lucky Block

Head to head

Metric [Rivers] Rise of Nations Be a Lucky BlockDifference
Playing now1,9051,644261
24h peak2,0982,05444
24h average1,7011,443258
7-day peak2,0982,05444
7-day average1,5591,429130
30-day peak2,0982,05444
All-time peak2,0982,231133
24h change 21.2% 1.1%
7d change
Total visits307.5M768.9M461.4M (2.5×)
Visits (24h)76.4K215.6K139.2K (2.8×)
Visits (7d)242.8K516K273.2K (2.1×)
Favorites645.3K3M2.3M (4.6×)
Rating87.2%94.9%
Global rank (players)#811#972of 4,278
Trending score29.03.0
CreatedNov 14, 2018Feb 24, 2026
GenreStrategySimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for [Rivers] Rise of Nations, 3 for Be a Lucky Block.

[Rivers] Rise of Nations vs Be a Lucky Block — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals