Shipping Lanes vs Animal Sim: Underwater

Animal Sim: Underwater currently leads with 882 concurrent players against 414, a 2.1× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Animal Sim: Underwater at 1,249 concurrent players, versus 929. Lifetime, Animal Sim: Underwater has more visits (264.7M vs 60.1M). Full side-by-side history for Shipping Lanes and Animal Sim: Underwater is charted above.

Shipping Lanes
414
playing now
879 24h peak · 60.1M visits
VS
Animal Sim: Underwater
882
playing now
1,249 24h peak · 264.7M visits

Player count history

Shipping LanesAnimal Sim: Underwater

Head to head

Metric Shipping Lanes Animal Sim: UnderwaterDifference
Playing now414882468 (2.1×)
24h peak8791,249370
24h average576911335 (1.6×)
7-day peak8991,249350
7-day average570858288 (1.5×)
30-day peak8991,249350
All-time peak9291,249320
24h change 0.9% 17.4%
7d change
Total visits60.1M264.7M204.6M (4.4×)
Visits (24h)34.8K107.1K72.3K (3.1×)
Visits (7d)113.5K335.4K221.9K (3.0×)
Favorites359.6K223.7K135.9K (1.6×)
Rating89.0%84.9%
Global rank (players)#1,879#1,325of 4,278
Trending score2.817.8
CreatedMay 5, 2015Apr 13, 2023
GenreSimulationRoleplay & Avatar Sim

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Shipping Lanes, 4 for Animal Sim: Underwater.

Shipping Lanes vs Animal Sim: Underwater — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals