Shipping Lanes vs [UPD] Cut a Gem
[UPD] Cut a Gem currently leads with 1,187 concurrent players against 612, a 1.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] Cut a Gem at 4,114 concurrent players, versus 929. Momentum favours Shipping Lanes: -11.3% week over week versus -18.6% for [UPD] Cut a Gem. Lifetime, Shipping Lanes has more visits (60.4M vs 10.9M). Full side-by-side history for Shipping Lanes and [UPD] Cut a Gem is charted above.
Shipping Lanes
612
playing now
710 24h peak · 60.4M visits
VS
[🔥UPD] Cut a Gem
1,187
playing now
1,540 24h peak · 10.9M visits
Player count history
Shipping Lanes[UPD] Cut a Gem
Head to head
| Metric | Shipping Lanes | [UPD] Cut a Gem | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 612 | 1,187 | 575 (1.9×) |
| 24h peak | 710 | 1,540 | 830 (2.2×) |
| 24h average | 555 | 1,199 | 644 (2.2×) |
| 7-day peak | 803 | 2,019 | 1,216 (2.5×) |
| 7-day average | 534 | 1,260 | 726 (2.4×) |
| 30-day peak | 803 | 2,191 | 1,388 (2.7×) |
| All-time peak | 929 | 4,114 | 3,185 (4.4×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 7.1% | ▼ 7.7% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 11.3% | ▼ 18.6% | — |
| Total visits | 60.4M | 10.9M | 49.5M (5.5×) |
| Visits (24h) | 29.9K | 98.8K | 69K (3.3×) |
| Visits (7d) | 224.5K | 803.1K | 578.7K (3.6×) |
| Favorites | 360.4K | 371.5K | 11.1K |
| Rating | 89.0% | 97.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,059 | #1,387 | of 8,197 |
| Trending score | 10.3 | -14.6 | — |
| Created | May 5, 2015 | May 23, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Shipping Lanes, 13 for [UPD] Cut a Gem.