Project Stardust vs Burn A City

Project Stardust currently leads with 169 concurrent players against 60, a 2.8Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Project Stardust at 223 concurrent players, versus 144. Lifetime, Project Stardust has more visits (20.9M vs 6.2M). Full side-by-side history for Project Stardust and Burn A City is charted above.

Project Stardust
169
playing now
201 24h peak Β· 20.9M visits
VS
πŸ”₯ Burn A City
60
playing now
96 24h peak Β· 6.2M visits

Player count history

Project StardustBurn A City

Head to head

Metric Project Stardust Burn A CityDifference
Playing now16960109 (2.8Γ—)
24h peak20196105 (2.1Γ—)
24h average1404892 (2.9Γ—)
7-day peak21814474 (1.5Γ—)
7-day average1375285 (2.6Γ—)
30-day peak21814474 (1.5Γ—)
All-time peak22314479 (1.5Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 8.5%β–Ό 11.1%β€”
7d changeβ–² 6.2%β€”β€”
Total visits20.9M6.2M14.6M (3.3Γ—)
Visits (24h)8.2K6.8K1.4K
Visits (7d)66.1K35K31.1K (1.9Γ—)
Favorites178.2K13.8K164.4K (12.9Γ—)
Rating87.7%90.1%β€”
Global rank (players)#3,426#4,094of 7,662
Trending score4.0-9.2β€”
CreatedSep 23, 2018Feb 27, 2026β€”
GenreActionSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 12 days for Project Stardust, 6 for Burn A City.

Project Stardust vs Burn A City β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals