Cube Defense vs Soccer Jumping

Soccer Jumping currently leads with 89 concurrent players against 24, a 3.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Soccer Jumping at 186 concurrent players, versus 78. Lifetime, Cube Defense has more visits (88.6M vs 7.7M). Full side-by-side history for Cube Defense and Soccer Jumping is charted above.

Cube Defense
24
playing now
57 24h peak · 88.6M visits
VS
Soccer Jumping ⚽️
89
playing now
186 24h peak · 7.7M visits

Player count history

Cube DefenseSoccer Jumping

Head to head

Metric Cube Defense Soccer JumpingDifference
Playing now248965 (3.7×)
24h peak57186129 (3.3×)
24h average3413197 (3.9×)
7-day peak78186108 (2.4×)
7-day average3812890 (3.4×)
30-day peak78186108 (2.4×)
All-time peak78186108 (2.4×)
24h change 12.8% 11.0%
7d change 2.7%
Total visits88.6M7.7M81M (11.6×)
Visits (24h)4.2K20.3K16.1K (4.8×)
Visits (7d)32.7K28K4.6K
Favorites211K393.1K182.1K (1.9×)
Rating83.0%95.9%
Global rank (players)#4,407#3,470of 7,213
Trending score-10.44.2
CreatedAug 28, 2018Mar 31, 2026
GenreStrategySimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Cube Defense, 3 for Soccer Jumping.

Cube Defense vs Soccer Jumping — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals