the COOL zone vs Eating in Jollibee
the COOL zone currently leads with 239 concurrent players against 41, a 5.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to the COOL zone at 284 concurrent players, versus 270. Lifetime, Eating in Jollibee has more visits (41.5M vs 21.5M). Full side-by-side history for the COOL zone and Eating in Jollibee is charted above.
the COOL zone
239
playing now
284 24h peak · 21.5M visits
VS
🍗🍟 Eating in Jollibee
41
playing now
270 24h peak · 41.5M visits
Player count history
the COOL zoneEating in Jollibee
Head to head
| Metric | the COOL zone | Eating in Jollibee | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 239 | 41 | 198 (5.8×) |
| 24h peak | 284 | 270 | 14 |
| 24h average | 204 | 141 | 63 |
| 7-day peak | 284 | 270 | 14 |
| 7-day average | 168 | 139 | 29 |
| 30-day peak | 284 | 270 | 14 |
| All-time peak | 284 | 270 | 14 |
| 24h change | ▲ 22.9% | ▲ 2.2% | — |
| 7d change | — | ▲ 71.6% | — |
| Total visits | 21.5M | 41.5M | 20M (1.9×) |
| Visits (24h) | 9K | 35.8K | 26.9K (4.0×) |
| Visits (7d) | 44.2K | 217K | 172.8K (4.9×) |
| Favorites | 98.8K | 4.1M | 4M (42.0×) |
| Rating | 87.0% | 95.1% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,927 | #4,443 | of 7,866 |
| Trending score | 43.5 | 2.7 | — |
| Created | Jul 30, 2018 | Sep 8, 2024 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 6 days for the COOL zone, 8 for Eating in Jollibee.