Hide and Seek Extreme vs [QOL] Azure Latch

[QOL] Azure Latch currently leads with 9,793 concurrent players against 3,822, a 2.6Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [QOL] Azure Latch at 17,882 concurrent players, versus 4,111. Lifetime, Hide and Seek Extreme has more visits (3.4B vs 538.3M). Full side-by-side history for Hide and Seek Extreme and [QOL] Azure Latch is charted above.

Hide and Seek Extreme
3,822
playing now
3,881 24h peak Β· 3.4B visits
VS
[🌱QOL] Azure Latch
9,793
playing now
17,882 24h peak Β· 538.3M visits

Player count history

Hide and Seek Extreme[QOL] Azure Latch

Head to head

Metric Hide and Seek Extreme [QOL] Azure LatchDifference
Playing now3,8229,7935,971 (2.6Γ—)
24h peak3,88117,88214,001 (4.6Γ—)
24h average3,24011,3708,130 (3.5Γ—)
7-day peak4,11117,88213,771 (4.3Γ—)
7-day average2,85210,6697,817 (3.7Γ—)
30-day peak4,11117,88213,771 (4.3Γ—)
All-time peak4,11117,88213,771 (4.3Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 9.9%β–Ό 1.8%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits3.4B538.3M2.9B (6.3Γ—)
Visits (24h)391.7K1M619.8K (2.6Γ—)
Visits (7d)1.9M4.2M2.4M (2.3Γ—)
Favorites6.9M615K6.3M (11.2Γ—)
Rating91.1%96.8%β€”
Global rank (players)#539#191of 5,275
Trending score47.426.6β€”
CreatedJan 18, 2015Dec 20, 2024β€”
GenreParty & CasualSports & Racingβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 6 days for Hide and Seek Extreme, 6 for [QOL] Azure Latch.

Hide and Seek Extreme vs [QOL] Azure Latch β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals