Hide and Seek Extreme vs Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]
Hide and Seek Extreme currently leads with 3,639 concurrent players against 1,833, a 2.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Hide and Seek Extreme at 4,127 concurrent players, versus 2,386. Momentum favours Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]: +13.2% week over week versus -1.2% for Hide and Seek Extreme. Lifetime, Hide and Seek Extreme has more visits (3.4B vs 98.2M). Full side-by-side history for Hide and Seek Extreme and Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] is charted above.
Hide and Seek Extreme
3,639
playing now
3,719 24h peak · 3.4B visits
VS
Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]
1,833
playing now
1,992 24h peak · 98.2M visits
Player count history
Hide and Seek ExtremeBuild a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]
Head to head
| Metric | Hide and Seek Extreme | Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 3,639 | 1,833 | 1,806 (2.0×) |
| 24h peak | 3,719 | 1,992 | 1,727 (1.9×) |
| 24h average | 3,235 | 1,774 | 1,461 (1.8×) |
| 7-day peak | 4,044 | 2,378 | 1,666 (1.7×) |
| 7-day average | 2,805 | 1,677 | 1,128 (1.7×) |
| 30-day peak | 4,111 | 2,378 | 1,733 (1.7×) |
| All-time peak | 4,127 | 2,386 | 1,741 (1.7×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 14.3% | ▼ 1.4% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 1.2% | ▲ 13.2% | — |
| Total visits | 3.4B | 98.2M | 3.3B (34.7×) |
| Visits (24h) | 382.2K | 129.5K | 252.7K (3.0×) |
| Visits (7d) | 2.6M | 930.5K | 1.7M (2.8×) |
| Favorites | 6.9M | 1.8M | 5.1M (3.9×) |
| Rating | 91.1% | 91.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #589 | #1,051 | of 8,284 |
| Trending score | 53.4 | 18.5 | — |
| Created | Jan 18, 2015 | Jun 30, 2017 | — |
| Genre | Party & Casual | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Hide and Seek Extreme, 12 for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS].