Hide and Seek Extreme vs RIOTFALL [FPS]
Hide and Seek Extreme currently leads with 2,589 concurrent players against 197, a 13.1× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Hide and Seek Extreme at 4,127 concurrent players, versus 4,039. Lifetime, Hide and Seek Extreme has more visits (3.4B vs 33.4M). Full side-by-side history for Hide and Seek Extreme and RIOTFALL [FPS] is charted above.
Hide and Seek Extreme
2,589
playing now
3,646 24h peak · 3.4B visits
VS
RIOTFALL [FPS]
197
playing now
486 24h peak · 33.4M visits
Player count history
Hide and Seek ExtremeRIOTFALL [FPS]
Head to head
| Metric | Hide and Seek Extreme | RIOTFALL [FPS] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,589 | 197 | 2,392 (13.1×) |
| 24h peak | 3,646 | 486 | 3,160 (7.5×) |
| 24h average | 2,718 | 319 | 2,399 (8.5×) |
| 7-day peak | 4,084 | 3,981 | 103 |
| 7-day average | 2,794 | 1,363 | 1,431 (2.0×) |
| 30-day peak | 4,111 | 3,981 | 130 |
| All-time peak | 4,127 | 4,039 | 88 |
| 24h change | ▲ 7.2% | ▼ 87.9% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 0.6% | — | — |
| Total visits | 3.4B | 33.4M | 3.4B (102.1×) |
| Visits (24h) | 348.3K | 67.6K | 280.7K (5.2×) |
| Visits (7d) | 2.7M | 739.2K | 1.9M (3.6×) |
| Favorites | 6.9M | 417.6K | 6.5M (16.6×) |
| Rating | 91.1% | 83.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #581 | #2,699 | of 7,126 |
| Trending score | -9.3 | -189.3 | — |
| Created | Jan 18, 2015 | Oct 21, 2021 | — |
| Genre | Party & Casual | Shooter | — |
Other comparisons
Hide and Seek Extreme vs [ACCESSORIES] Anime StarsHide and Seek Extreme vs Afraid MonkeysHide and Seek Extreme vs [QOL] Your Bizarre AdventureHide and Seek Extreme vs [ADRIEN] Miraculous RP: Ladybug & Cat NoirHide and Seek Extreme vs AIMBOT [FPS]Hide and Seek Extreme vs MOUNT RNGCompare two other games →
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for Hide and Seek Extreme, 2 for RIOTFALL [FPS].