Hide and Seek Extreme vs Build to Survive [TESTING]
Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 5,619 concurrent players against 3,166, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 4,127. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +6.8% week over week versus -1.8% for Hide and Seek Extreme. Lifetime, Hide and Seek Extreme has more visits (3.4B vs 268.8M). Full side-by-side history for Hide and Seek Extreme and Build to Survive [TESTING] is charted above.
Hide and Seek Extreme
3,166
playing now
3,838 24h peak · 3.4B visits
VS
Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
5,619
playing now
6,794 24h peak · 268.8M visits
Player count history
Hide and Seek ExtremeBuild to Survive [TESTING]
Head to head
| Metric | Hide and Seek Extreme | Build to Survive [TESTING] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 3,166 | 5,619 | 2,453 (1.8×) |
| 24h peak | 3,838 | 6,794 | 2,956 (1.8×) |
| 24h average | 3,219 | 5,546 | 2,327 (1.7×) |
| 7-day peak | 3,838 | 6,794 | 2,956 (1.8×) |
| 7-day average | 2,796 | 5,085 | 2,289 (1.8×) |
| 30-day peak | 4,111 | 6,794 | 2,683 (1.7×) |
| All-time peak | 4,127 | 7,729 | 3,602 (1.9×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 13.9% | ▲ 11.7% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 1.8% | ▲ 6.8% | — |
| Total visits | 3.4B | 268.8M | 3.1B (12.7×) |
| Visits (24h) | 396.3K | 474.3K | 77.9K |
| Visits (7d) | 2.6M | 3.2M | 588.1K |
| Favorites | 6.9M | 5.6M | 1.3M |
| Rating | 91.1% | 96.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #580 | #311 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 52.6 | 33.8 | — |
| Created | Jan 18, 2015 | Aug 12, 2021 | — |
| Genre | Party & Casual | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Hide and Seek Extreme, 12 for Build to Survive [TESTING].