Hide and Seek Extreme vs Forgotten Worlds

Forgotten Worlds currently leads with 2,744 concurrent players against 2,496. On all-time peak the record belongs to Hide and Seek Extreme at 4,127 concurrent players, versus 3,189. Momentum favours Forgotten Worlds: +8.0% week over week versus +0.3% for Hide and Seek Extreme. Lifetime, Hide and Seek Extreme has more visits (3.4B vs 597.9M). Full side-by-side history for Hide and Seek Extreme and Forgotten Worlds is charted above.

Hide and Seek Extreme
2,496
playing now
3,646 24h peak · 3.4B visits
VS
Forgotten Worlds
2,744
playing now
3,189 24h peak · 597.9M visits

Player count history

Hide and Seek ExtremeForgotten Worlds

Head to head

Metric Hide and Seek Extreme Forgotten WorldsDifference
Playing now2,4962,744248
24h peak3,6463,189457
24h average2,6672,59671
7-day peak4,0843,189895
7-day average2,7842,124660
30-day peak4,1113,189922
All-time peak4,1273,189938
24h change 4.9% 22.6%
7d change 0.3% 8.0%
Total visits3.4B597.9M2.8B (5.7×)
Visits (24h)353.8K209.1K144.7K (1.7×)
Visits (7d)2.7M1.3M1.3M (2.0×)
Favorites6.9M1.3M5.6M (5.4×)
Rating91.1%91.7%
Global rank (players)#571#540of 7,215
Trending score-14.375.0
CreatedJan 18, 2015Mar 17, 2019
GenreParty & CasualRoleplay & Avatar Sim

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Hide and Seek Extreme, 9 for Forgotten Worlds.

Hide and Seek Extreme vs Forgotten Worlds — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals