Hide and Seek Extreme vs Eat the World

Eat the World currently leads with 4,281 concurrent players against 2,325, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Eat the World at 5,261 concurrent players, versus 4,111. Lifetime, Hide and Seek Extreme has more visits (3.4B vs 615.5M). Full side-by-side history for Hide and Seek Extreme and Eat the World is charted above.

Hide and Seek Extreme
2,325
playing now
3,919 24h peak · 3.4B visits
VS
Eat the World
4,281
playing now
4,747 24h peak · 615.5M visits

Player count history

Hide and Seek ExtremeEat the World

Head to head

Metric Hide and Seek Extreme Eat the WorldDifference
Playing now2,3254,2811,956 (1.8×)
24h peak3,9194,747828
24h average2,8424,0501,208
7-day peak4,1115,2401,129
7-day average2,7763,8411,065
30-day peak4,1115,2401,129
All-time peak4,1115,2611,150
24h change 15.7% 1.3%
7d change
Total visits3.4B615.5M2.8B (5.5×)
Visits (24h)374.6K379K4.5K
Visits (7d)1.3M1.4M115.2K
Favorites6.9M27.8M20.9M (4.0×)
Rating91.1%94.7%
Global rank (players)#660#394of 4,380
Trending score8.119.5
CreatedJan 18, 2015Feb 22, 2024
GenreParty & CasualSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Hide and Seek Extreme, 5 for Eat the World.

Hide and Seek Extreme vs Eat the World — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals