Hide and Seek Extreme vs Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
Hide and Seek Extreme currently leads with 3,166 concurrent players against 2,171. On all-time peak the record belongs to Hide and Seek Extreme at 4,127 concurrent players, versus 2,854. Momentum favours Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]: +184.2% week over week versus -1.8% for Hide and Seek Extreme. Lifetime, Hide and Seek Extreme has more visits (3.4B vs 4.5M). Full side-by-side history for Hide and Seek Extreme and Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] is charted above.
Hide and Seek Extreme
3,166
playing now
3,838 24h peak · 3.4B visits
VS
[👑] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
2,171
playing now
2,635 24h peak · 4.5M visits
Player count history
Hide and Seek ExtremeTotal Conquest WW2 [Beta]
Head to head
| Metric | Hide and Seek Extreme | Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 3,166 | 2,171 | 995 |
| 24h peak | 3,838 | 2,635 | 1,203 |
| 24h average | 3,219 | 2,209 | 1,010 |
| 7-day peak | 3,838 | 2,734 | 1,104 |
| 7-day average | 2,796 | 1,904 | 892 |
| 30-day peak | 4,111 | 2,734 | 1,377 (1.5×) |
| All-time peak | 4,127 | 2,854 | 1,273 |
| 24h change | ▲ 13.9% | ▼ 4.0% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 1.8% | ▲ 184.2% | — |
| Total visits | 3.4B | 4.5M | 3.4B (761.2×) |
| Visits (24h) | 396.3K | 434.8K | 38.5K |
| Visits (7d) | 2.6M | 3M | 351.8K |
| Favorites | 6.9M | 28.5K | 6.9M (242.7×) |
| Rating | 91.1% | 92.3% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #580 | #815 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 52.6 | 52.9 | — |
| Created | Jan 18, 2015 | Jul 29, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Party & Casual | Strategy | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Hide and Seek Extreme, 12 for Total Conquest WW2 [Beta].