[UPD] Backpacking vs Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] currently leads with 2,405 concurrent players against 887, a 2.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] at 2,854 concurrent players, versus 1,587. Lifetime, [UPD] Backpacking has more visits (336.9M vs 4.4M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] Backpacking and Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] is charted above.
[🪑UPD] Backpacking⛺🐻
887
playing now
1,281 24h peak · 336.9M visits
VS
[👑] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
2,405
playing now
2,635 24h peak · 4.4M visits
Player count history
[UPD] BackpackingTotal Conquest WW2 [Beta]
Head to head
| Metric | [UPD] Backpacking | Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 887 | 2,405 | 1,518 (2.7×) |
| 24h peak | 1,281 | 2,635 | 1,354 (2.1×) |
| 24h average | 997 | 2,294 | 1,297 (2.3×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,538 | 2,734 | 1,196 (1.8×) |
| 7-day average | 942 | 1,918 | 976 (2.0×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,538 | 2,734 | 1,196 (1.8×) |
| All-time peak | 1,587 | 2,854 | 1,267 (1.8×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 4.0% | ▲ 0.2% | — |
| 7d change | — | ▲ 188.0% | — |
| Total visits | 336.9M | 4.4M | 332.5M (75.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 92.2K | 420.7K | 328.5K (4.6×) |
| Visits (7d) | 567K | 2.9M | 2.4M (5.2×) |
| Favorites | 1.3M | 28.3K | 1.3M (45.7×) |
| Rating | 88.1% | 92.3% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,612 | #833 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 17.1 | 65.1 | — |
| Created | Jun 22, 2018 | Jul 29, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Adventure | Strategy | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 7 days for [UPD] Backpacking, 12 for Total Conquest WW2 [Beta].