Natural Disaster Survival vs Catch And Tame!

Catch And Tame! currently leads with 11,690 concurrent players against 7,360, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Catch And Tame! at 108,580 concurrent players, versus 15,152. Momentum favours Catch And Tame!: +10.5% week over week versus -2.9% for Natural Disaster Survival. Lifetime, Natural Disaster Survival has more visits (4.4B vs 442.6M). Full side-by-side history for Natural Disaster Survival and Catch And Tame! is charted above.

Natural Disaster Survival
7,360
playing now
13,442 24h peak · 4.4B visits
VS
[🧸] Catch And Tame!
11,690
playing now
16,155 24h peak · 442.6M visits

Player count history

Natural Disaster SurvivalCatch And Tame!

Head to head

Metric Natural Disaster Survival Catch And Tame!Difference
Playing now7,36011,6904,330 (1.6×)
24h peak13,44216,1552,713
24h average8,77610,4951,719
7-day peak13,85297,54183,689 (7.0×)
7-day average9,54813,7354,187
30-day peak13,85297,54183,689 (7.0×)
All-time peak15,152108,58093,428 (7.2×)
24h change 8.9% 15.0%
7d change 2.9% 10.5%
Total visits4.4B442.6M4B (10.0×)
Visits (24h)1.7M893.4K772.4K (1.9×)
Visits (7d)11.6M8.6M3M
Favorites11.8M1.3M10.5M (9.4×)
Rating90.8%98.1%
Global rank (players)#256#153of 8,197
Trending score-31.8-94.7
CreatedMar 28, 2008Nov 2, 2025
GenreSurvivalSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Natural Disaster Survival, 13 for Catch And Tame!.