Natural Disaster Survival vs Dig to Escape

Dig to Escape currently leads with 12,118 concurrent players against 10,515. On all-time peak the record belongs to Natural Disaster Survival at 15,152 concurrent players, versus 15,042. Momentum favours Dig to Escape: +53.0% week over week versus +2.8% for Natural Disaster Survival. Lifetime, Natural Disaster Survival has more visits (4.4B vs 553.2M). Full side-by-side history for Natural Disaster Survival and Dig to Escape is charted above.

Natural Disaster Survival
10,515
playing now
12,695 24h peak · 4.4B visits
VS
⛏️Dig to Escape
12,118
playing now
15,042 24h peak · 553.2M visits

Player count history

Natural Disaster SurvivalDig to Escape

Head to head

Metric Natural Disaster Survival Dig to EscapeDifference
Playing now10,51512,1181,603
24h peak12,69515,0422,347
24h average9,92511,7091,784
7-day peak15,07715,04235
7-day average9,9688,4531,515
30-day peak15,07715,04235
All-time peak15,15215,042110
24h change 5.7% 19.0%
7d change 2.8% 53.0%
Total visits4.4B553.2M3.9B (8.0×)
Visits (24h)1.6M1.4M215.2K
Visits (7d)11.7M7.4M4.3M (1.6×)
Favorites11.8M559.3K11.2M (21.1×)
Rating90.8%97.8%
Global rank (players)#170#141of 7,866
Trending score-1.7156.3
CreatedMar 28, 2008Nov 10, 2025
GenreSurvivalSurvival

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Natural Disaster Survival, 12 for Dig to Escape.