Natural Disaster Survival vs Eat Blobs Simulator

Natural Disaster Survival currently leads with 10,061 concurrent players against 1,096, a 9.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Natural Disaster Survival at 15,152 concurrent players, versus 1,799. Momentum favours Eat Blobs Simulator: +18.7% week over week versus -1.4% for Natural Disaster Survival. Lifetime, Natural Disaster Survival has more visits (4.4B vs 241.3M). Full side-by-side history for Natural Disaster Survival and Eat Blobs Simulator is charted above.

Natural Disaster Survival
10,061
playing now
13,442 24h peak · 4.4B visits
VS
Eat Blobs Simulator
1,096
playing now
1,637 24h peak · 241.3M visits

Player count history

Natural Disaster SurvivalEat Blobs Simulator

Head to head

Metric Natural Disaster Survival Eat Blobs SimulatorDifference
Playing now10,0611,0968,965 (9.2×)
24h peak13,4421,63711,805 (8.2×)
24h average9,6141,0478,567 (9.2×)
7-day peak13,8521,73212,120 (8.0×)
7-day average9,7031,0098,694 (9.6×)
30-day peak13,8521,73212,120 (8.0×)
All-time peak15,1521,79913,353 (8.4×)
24h change 0.3% 9.2%
7d change 1.4% 18.7%
Total visits4.4B241.3M4.2B (18.3×)
Visits (24h)1.7M122.1K1.5M (13.7×)
Visits (7d)11.6M902.1K10.7M (12.9×)
Favorites11.8M1.3M10.5M (9.2×)
Rating90.8%77.3%
Global rank (players)#192#1,478of 8,197
Trending score-3.611.1
CreatedMar 28, 2008Dec 8, 2021
GenreSurvivalSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Natural Disaster Survival, 13 for Eat Blobs Simulator.