Natural Disaster Survival vs Build to Survive [TESTING]

Natural Disaster Survival currently leads with 12,012 concurrent players against 3,870, a 3.1Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Natural Disaster Survival at 12,794 concurrent players, versus 6,072. Lifetime, Natural Disaster Survival has more visits (4.4B vs 264.5M). Full side-by-side history for Natural Disaster Survival and Build to Survive [TESTING] is charted above.

Natural Disaster Survival
12,012
playing now
12,794 24h peak Β· 4.4B visits
VS
Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
3,870
playing now
6,072 24h peak Β· 264.5M visits

Player count history

Natural Disaster SurvivalBuild to Survive [TESTING]

Head to head

Metric Natural Disaster Survival Build to Survive [TESTING]Difference
Playing now12,0123,8708,142 (3.1Γ—)
24h peak12,7946,0726,722 (2.1Γ—)
24h average10,4854,6935,792 (2.2Γ—)
7-day peak12,7946,0726,722 (2.1Γ—)
7-day average9,6894,4505,239 (2.2Γ—)
30-day peak12,7946,0726,722 (2.1Γ—)
All-time peak12,7946,0726,722 (2.1Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 17.7%β–² 12.7%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits4.4B264.5M4.1B (16.6Γ—)
Visits (24h)1.6M422.2K1.2M (3.7Γ—)
Visits (7d)5M981.1K4M (5.1Γ—)
Favorites11.8M5.5M6.2M (2.1Γ—)
Rating90.8%96.5%β€”
Global rank (players)#114#405of 4,278
Trending score33.019.9β€”
CreatedMar 28, 2008Aug 12, 2021β€”
GenreSurvivalSurvivalβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for Natural Disaster Survival, 3 for Build to Survive [TESTING].

Natural Disaster Survival vs Build to Survive [TESTING] β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals