Natural Disaster Survival vs Build to Survive

Natural Disaster Survival currently leads with 10,120 concurrent players against 4,123, a 2.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Natural Disaster Survival at 15,152 concurrent players, versus 7,252. Momentum favours Natural Disaster Survival: -2.4% week over week versus -6.5% for Build to Survive. Lifetime, Natural Disaster Survival has more visits (4.4B vs 409.7M). Full side-by-side history for Natural Disaster Survival and Build to Survive is charted above.

Natural Disaster Survival
10,120
playing now
12,788 24h peak · 4.4B visits
VS
Build to Survive 🛠️
4,123
playing now
6,972 24h peak · 409.7M visits

Player count history

Natural Disaster SurvivalBuild to Survive

Head to head

Metric Natural Disaster Survival Build to SurviveDifference
Playing now10,1204,1235,997 (2.5×)
24h peak12,7886,9725,816 (1.8×)
24h average10,5224,9835,539 (2.1×)
7-day peak13,4067,0866,320 (1.9×)
7-day average9,7654,9504,815 (2.0×)
30-day peak13,4067,0866,320 (1.9×)
All-time peak15,1527,2527,900 (2.1×)
24h change 7.4% 9.7%
7d change 2.4% 6.5%
Total visits4.4B409.7M4B (10.8×)
Visits (24h)1.7M532.3K1.2M (3.2×)
Visits (7d)11.5M3.4M8.1M (3.3×)
Favorites11.8M10.9M841.2K
Rating90.8%96.2%
Global rank (players)#102#282of 8,338
Trending score31.12.5
CreatedMar 28, 2008Feb 12, 2021
GenreSurvivalSurvival

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for Natural Disaster Survival, 13 for Build to Survive.