Natural Disaster Survival vs FNAF: Eternal Nights

Natural Disaster Survival currently leads with 12,012 concurrent players against 5,622, a 2.1Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Natural Disaster Survival at 12,794 concurrent players, versus 5,983. Lifetime, Natural Disaster Survival has more visits (4.4B vs 313.2M). Full side-by-side history for Natural Disaster Survival and FNAF: Eternal Nights is charted above.

Natural Disaster Survival
12,012
playing now
12,794 24h peak Β· 4.4B visits
VS
FNAF: Eternal Nights πŸ•
5,622
playing now
5,777 24h peak Β· 313.2M visits

Player count history

Natural Disaster SurvivalFNAF: Eternal Nights

Head to head

Metric Natural Disaster Survival FNAF: Eternal NightsDifference
Playing now12,0125,6226,390 (2.1Γ—)
24h peak12,7945,7777,017 (2.2Γ—)
24h average10,4854,5415,944 (2.3Γ—)
7-day peak12,7945,9836,811 (2.1Γ—)
7-day average9,6894,3765,313 (2.2Γ—)
30-day peak12,7945,9836,811 (2.1Γ—)
All-time peak12,7945,9836,811 (2.1Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 17.7%β–² 23.6%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits4.4B313.2M4.1B (14.0Γ—)
Visits (24h)1.6M530.2K1M (3.0Γ—)
Visits (7d)5M1.8M3.2M (2.8Γ—)
Favorites11.8M836.8K10.9M (14.1Γ—)
Rating90.8%94.4%β€”
Global rank (players)#114#262of 4,278
Trending score33.013.7β€”
CreatedMar 28, 2008Oct 27, 2022β€”
GenreSurvivalSurvivalβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for Natural Disaster Survival, 4 for FNAF: Eternal Nights.

Natural Disaster Survival vs FNAF: Eternal Nights β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals