Be a Hole vs Surf for Lucky Blocks

Surf for Lucky Blocks currently leads with 1,946 concurrent players against 1,148, a 1.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Be a Hole at 3,105 concurrent players, versus 2,883. Momentum favours Surf for Lucky Blocks: +5.2% week over week versus -17.6% for Be a Hole. Lifetime, Be a Hole has more visits (254.9M vs 36.1M). Full side-by-side history for Be a Hole and Surf for Lucky Blocks is charted above.

🕳️ Be a Hole
1,148
playing now
1,843 24h peak · 254.9M visits
VS
Surf for Lucky Blocks
1,946
playing now
2,883 24h peak · 36.1M visits

Player count history

Be a HoleSurf for Lucky Blocks

Head to head

Metric Be a Hole Surf for Lucky BlocksDifference
Playing now1,1481,946798 (1.7×)
24h peak1,8432,8831,040 (1.6×)
24h average1,3562,052696 (1.5×)
7-day peak2,9672,88384
7-day average1,5291,853324
30-day peak2,9672,88384
All-time peak3,1052,883222
24h change 15.4% 6.7%
7d change 17.6% 5.2%
Total visits254.9M36.1M218.8M (7.1×)
Visits (24h)241K215.5K25.5K
Visits (7d)1.9M1.4M502.2K
Favorites5.4M1.5M4M (3.7×)
Rating84.9%88.2%
Global rank (players)#1,329#871of 7,866
Trending score-34.935.1
CreatedJun 23, 2024Mar 31, 2026
GenreSimulationSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Be a Hole, 10 for Surf for Lucky Blocks.