Be a Hole vs +1 Sword Fighting Escape

Be a Hole currently leads with 1,236 concurrent players against 1,161. On all-time peak the record belongs to Be a Hole at 3,105 concurrent players, versus 2,131. Momentum favours +1 Sword Fighting Escape: +95.4% week over week versus -17.3% for Be a Hole. Lifetime, Be a Hole has more visits (254.9M vs 1.4M). Full side-by-side history for Be a Hole and +1 Sword Fighting Escape is charted above.

πŸ•³οΈ Be a Hole
1,236
playing now
1,843 24h peak Β· 254.9M visits
VS
+1 Sword Fighting Escape βš”οΈ
1,161
playing now
1,978 24h peak Β· 1.4M visits

Player count history

Be a Hole+1 Sword Fighting Escape

Head to head

Metric Be a Hole +1 Sword Fighting EscapeDifference
Playing now1,2361,16175
24h peak1,8431,978135
24h average1,3791,30871
7-day peak2,9672,059908
7-day average1,534969565 (1.6Γ—)
30-day peak2,9672,059908
All-time peak3,1052,131974
24h changeβ–² 17.4%β–Ό 18.8%β€”
7d changeβ–Ό 17.3%β–² 95.4%β€”
Total visits254.9M1.4M253.5M (178.9Γ—)
Visits (24h)234.5K176.4K58.1K
Visits (7d)1.9M859.3K1M (2.2Γ—)
Favorites5.4M2.8K5.4M (1922.4Γ—)
Rating84.9%90.3%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,334#1,323of 7,866
Trending score-31.3106.4β€”
CreatedJun 23, 2024Jun 28, 2026β€”
GenreSimulationSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 12 days for Be a Hole, 11 for +1 Sword Fighting Escape.