Be a Hole vs WARDEN Survival Delver
WARDEN Survival Delver currently leads with 2,309 concurrent players against 1,314, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Be a Hole at 3,105 concurrent players, versus 2,919. Momentum favours WARDEN Survival Delver: -4.9% week over week versus -16.2% for Be a Hole. Lifetime, Be a Hole has more visits (254.9M vs 7.9M). Full side-by-side history for Be a Hole and WARDEN Survival Delver is charted above.
🕳️ Be a Hole
1,314
playing now
1,843 24h peak · 254.9M visits
VS
WARDEN 🐲 Survival Delver
2,309
playing now
2,756 24h peak · 7.9M visits
Player count history
Be a HoleWARDEN Survival Delver
Head to head
| Metric | Be a Hole | WARDEN Survival Delver | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,314 | 2,309 | 995 (1.8×) |
| 24h peak | 1,843 | 2,756 | 913 |
| 24h average | 1,420 | 2,121 | 701 |
| 7-day peak | 2,967 | 2,756 | 211 |
| 7-day average | 1,555 | 1,724 | 169 |
| 30-day peak | 2,967 | 2,841 | 126 |
| All-time peak | 3,105 | 2,919 | 186 |
| 24h change | ▲ 23.2% | ▲ 3.3% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 16.2% | ▼ 4.9% | — |
| Total visits | 254.9M | 7.9M | 247M (32.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 232.4K | 138.9K | 93.6K (1.7×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.9M | 1M | 870.3K (1.8×) |
| Favorites | 5.4M | 239.6K | 5.2M (22.7×) |
| Rating | 84.9% | 93.0% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,255 | #834 | of 7,786 |
| Trending score | -27.0 | 75.5 | — |
| Created | Jun 23, 2024 | Dec 27, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Be a Hole, 12 for WARDEN Survival Delver.