Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] vs FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] currently leads with 1,516 concurrent players against 994, a 1.5Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] at 1,777 concurrent players, versus 1,769. Lifetime, Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] has more visits (183.9M vs 6M). Full side-by-side history for Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] and FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB is charted above.

Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER]
1,516
playing now
1,712 24h peak Β· 183.9M visits
VS
😑 FAST WAVE 😑 X99999999 ETFB
994
playing now
1,751 24h peak Β· 6M visits

Player count history

Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER]FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

Head to head

Metric Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFBDifference
Playing now1,516994522 (1.5Γ—)
24h peak1,7121,75139
24h average1,4181,264154
7-day peak1,7771,75126
7-day average1,2691,28112
30-day peak1,7771,75126
All-time peak1,7771,7698
24h changeβ–² 15.0%β–Ό 4.3%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits183.9M6M177.9M (30.5Γ—)
Visits (24h)215K191.6K23.4K
Visits (7d)787.6K302.4K485.2K (2.6Γ—)
Favorites520.5K669.8K149.3K
Rating74.1%81.7%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,090#1,388of 4,573
Trending score36.3-4.0β€”
CreatedJun 22, 2024Apr 24, 2026β€”
GenreObby & PlatformerSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER], 2 for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB.

Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] vs FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals