Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] vs [ NEW SZN] Arcade Basketball

Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] currently leads with 936 concurrent players against 423, a 2.2Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] at 2,250 concurrent players, versus 2,092. Momentum favours Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER]: +8.5% week over week versus -27.0% for [ NEW SZN] Arcade Basketball. Lifetime, Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] has more visits (185.2M vs 134.4M). Full side-by-side history for Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] and [ NEW SZN] Arcade Basketball is charted above.

Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER]
936
playing now
1,739 24h peak Β· 185.2M visits
VS
[πŸ¦– NEW SZN] Arcade Basketball πŸ€
423
playing now
1,300 24h peak Β· 134.4M visits

Player count history

Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER][ NEW SZN] Arcade Basketball

Head to head

Metric Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] [ NEW SZN] Arcade BasketballDifference
Playing now936423513 (2.2Γ—)
24h peak1,7391,300439
24h average1,204693511 (1.7Γ—)
7-day peak2,2012,092109
7-day average1,352997355
30-day peak2,2012,092109
All-time peak2,2502,092158
24h changeβ–Ό 6.6%β–Ό 16.6%β€”
7d changeβ–² 8.5%β–Ό 27.0%β€”
Total visits185.2M134.4M50.8M
Visits (24h)218.9K131.5K87.4K (1.7Γ—)
Visits (7d)1.6M1.3M348.4K
Favorites523.3K827.9K304.6K (1.6Γ—)
Rating74.1%89.5%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,232#1,721of 7,328
Trending score-33.1-84.7β€”
CreatedJun 22, 2024Jun 10, 2025β€”
GenreObby & PlatformerSports & Racingβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER], 11 for [ NEW SZN] Arcade Basketball.

Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] vs [ NEW SZN] Arcade Basketball β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals