Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] vs Roll to Defend

Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] currently leads with 1,003 concurrent players against 833. On all-time peak the record belongs to Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] at 1,777 concurrent players, versus 1,563. Lifetime, Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] has more visits (183.8M vs 13.6M). Full side-by-side history for Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] and Roll to Defend is charted above.

Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER]
1,003
playing now
1,712 24h peak · 183.8M visits
VS
Roll to Defend
833
playing now
1,096 24h peak · 13.6M visits

Player count history

Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER]Roll to Defend

Head to head

Metric Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] Roll to DefendDifference
Playing now1,003833170
24h peak1,7121,096616 (1.6×)
24h average1,213883330
7-day peak1,7771,563214
7-day average1,2321,15181
30-day peak1,7771,563214
All-time peak1,7771,563214
24h change 1.9% 13.9%
7d change
Total visits183.8M13.6M170.3M (13.5×)
Visits (24h)209K69.9K139.1K (3.0×)
Visits (7d)726.1K315.5K410.6K (2.3×)
Favorites520.4K28.9K491.5K (18.0×)
Rating74.1%95.8%
Global rank (players)#1,350#1,452of 4,576
Trending score-4.7-67.3
CreatedJun 22, 2024May 14, 2026
GenreObby & PlatformerSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER], 5 for Roll to Defend.

Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] vs Roll to Defend — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals