Battle of Alliance [New!] vs Would You Rather: Animals Tower

Battle of Alliance [New!] currently leads with 414 concurrent players against 180, a 2.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Would You Rather: Animals Tower at 1,225 concurrent players, versus 524. Lifetime, Battle of Alliance [New!] has more visits (13.7M vs 3.6M). Full side-by-side history for Battle of Alliance [New!] and Would You Rather: Animals Tower is charted above.

Battle of Alliance [New!]
414
playing now
487 24h peak · 13.7M visits
VS
Would You Rather: Animals Tower
180
playing now
253 24h peak · 3.6M visits

Player count history

Battle of Alliance [New!]Would You Rather: Animals Tower

Head to head

Metric Battle of Alliance [New!] Would You Rather: Animals TowerDifference
Playing now414180234 (2.3×)
24h peak487253234 (1.9×)
24h average339173166 (2.0×)
7-day peak51155948
7-day average36126992
30-day peak5111,170659 (2.3×)
All-time peak5241,225701 (2.3×)
24h change 7.4% 13.9%
7d change 67.6%
Total visits13.7M3.6M10.1M (3.8×)
Visits (24h)43.4K34.6K8.8K
Visits (7d)143.1K394.2K251.2K (2.8×)
Favorites21.5K450.1K428.6K (20.9×)
Rating77.1%91.8%
Global rank (players)#2,167#3,020of 7,326
Trending score-14.5-73.9
CreatedJun 21, 2024Jun 25, 2026
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimObby & Platformer

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Battle of Alliance [New!], 11 for Would You Rather: Animals Tower.

Battle of Alliance [New!] vs Would You Rather: Animals Tower — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals