[X2] Freeze for UGC vs [] Fly Hide & Seek

[] Fly Hide & Seek currently leads with 5,210 concurrent players against 2,803, a 1.9Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [] Fly Hide & Seek at 6,372 concurrent players, versus 6,305. Lifetime, [] Fly Hide & Seek has more visits (48.4M vs 20.9M). Full side-by-side history for [X2] Freeze for UGC and [] Fly Hide & Seek is charted above.

[X2] Freeze for UGC 🧊
2,803
playing now
4,815 24h peak Β· 20.9M visits
VS
[🏜] Fly Hide & Seek
5,210
playing now
6,372 24h peak Β· 48.4M visits

Player count history

[X2] Freeze for UGC[] Fly Hide & Seek

Head to head

Metric [X2] Freeze for UGC [] Fly Hide & SeekDifference
Playing now2,8035,2102,407 (1.9Γ—)
24h peak4,8156,3721,557
24h average3,1984,9231,725 (1.5Γ—)
7-day peak6,1386,372234
7-day average2,7653,619854
30-day peak6,1386,372234
All-time peak6,3056,37267
24h changeβ–² 11.5%β–² 60.4%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits20.9M48.4M27.5M (2.3Γ—)
Visits (24h)523.7K505.5K18.3K
Visits (7d)1.4M1M377.4K
Favorites218.6K3.7M3.5M (16.9Γ—)
Rating79.5%92.1%β€”
Global rank (players)#608#298of 4,279
Trending score54.4132.2β€”
CreatedJun 21, 2024Nov 10, 2025β€”
GenreObby & PlatformerParty & Casualβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for [X2] Freeze for UGC, 3 for [] Fly Hide & Seek.

[X2] Freeze for UGC vs [] Fly Hide & Seek β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals