[X2] Freeze for UGC vs Build a Soccer Team
[X2] Freeze for UGC currently leads with 1,908 concurrent players against 868, a 2.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [X2] Freeze for UGC at 6,305 concurrent players, versus 4,254. Momentum favours Build a Soccer Team: -4.2% week over week versus -6.8% for [X2] Freeze for UGC. Lifetime, [X2] Freeze for UGC has more visits (24.3M vs 5.2M). Full side-by-side history for [X2] Freeze for UGC and Build a Soccer Team is charted above.
[X2] Freeze for UGC 🧊
1,908
playing now
2,601 24h peak · 24.3M visits
VS
Build a Soccer Team [🎲]
868
playing now
3,325 24h peak · 5.2M visits
Player count history
[X2] Freeze for UGCBuild a Soccer Team
Head to head
| Metric | [X2] Freeze for UGC | Build a Soccer Team | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,908 | 868 | 1,040 (2.2×) |
| 24h peak | 2,601 | 3,325 | 724 |
| 24h average | 2,183 | 849 | 1,334 (2.6×) |
| 7-day peak | 4,037 | 3,325 | 712 |
| 7-day average | 2,490 | 1,016 | 1,474 (2.5×) |
| 30-day peak | 4,815 | 3,325 | 1,490 |
| All-time peak | 6,305 | 4,254 | 2,051 |
| 24h change | ▼ 26.5% | ▼ 21.4% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 6.8% | ▼ 4.2% | — |
| Total visits | 24.3M | 5.2M | 19.1M (4.6×) |
| Visits (24h) | 361.8K | 77.8K | 283.9K (4.6×) |
| Visits (7d) | 2.7M | 688.8K | 2M (3.9×) |
| Favorites | 232.8K | 9K | 223.9K (25.9×) |
| Rating | 79.5% | 96.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #993 | #1,649 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | -40.8 | -47.1 | — |
| Created | Jun 21, 2024 | Jun 27, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Obby & Platformer | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for [X2] Freeze for UGC, 13 for Build a Soccer Team.