[X2] Freeze for UGC vs [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape
[2X] Get Fat to Break Tape currently leads with 4,089 concurrent players against 2,529, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [X2] Freeze for UGC at 6,305 concurrent players, versus 4,089. Momentum favours [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape: +5.3% week over week versus -6.8% for [X2] Freeze for UGC. Lifetime, [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape has more visits (43.2M vs 23.9M). Full side-by-side history for [X2] Freeze for UGC and [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape is charted above.
[X2] Freeze for UGC 🧊
2,529
playing now
3,814 24h peak · 23.9M visits
VS
[2X🍗] Get Fat to Break Tape 🍗
4,089
playing now
4,049 24h peak · 43.2M visits
Player count history
[X2] Freeze for UGC[2X] Get Fat to Break Tape
Head to head
| Metric | [X2] Freeze for UGC | [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,529 | 4,089 | 1,560 (1.6×) |
| 24h peak | 3,814 | 4,049 | 235 |
| 24h average | 2,756 | 3,310 | 554 |
| 7-day peak | 4,037 | 4,049 | 12 |
| 7-day average | 2,524 | 2,332 | 192 |
| 30-day peak | 4,815 | 4,049 | 766 |
| All-time peak | 6,305 | 4,089 | 2,216 (1.5×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 3.5% | ▲ 55.8% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 6.8% | ▲ 5.3% | — |
| Total visits | 23.9M | 43.2M | 19.3M (1.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 415.7K | 378.6K | 37.1K |
| Visits (7d) | 2.6M | 1.9M | 734.2K |
| Favorites | 231.2K | 2.4M | 2.1M (10.3×) |
| Rating | 79.4% | 98.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #780 | #486 | of 7,866 |
| Trending score | 31.3 | 146.1 | — |
| Created | Jun 21, 2024 | May 8, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Obby & Platformer | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for [X2] Freeze for UGC, 12 for [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape.