Freeze for UGC vs [FPS] Flick

Freeze for UGC currently leads with 2,881 concurrent players against 2,101. On all-time peak the record belongs to Freeze for UGC at 6,305 concurrent players, versus 4,793. Momentum favours [FPS] Flick: +11.7% week over week versus -4.4% for Freeze for UGC. Lifetime, [FPS] Flick has more visits (466.4M vs 23.1M). Full side-by-side history for Freeze for UGC and [FPS] Flick is charted above.

Freeze for UGC 🧊
2,881
playing now
4,061 24h peak Β· 23.1M visits
VS
[FPS] Flick
2,101
playing now
3,948 24h peak Β· 466.4M visits

Player count history

Freeze for UGC[FPS] Flick

Head to head

Metric Freeze for UGC [FPS] FlickDifference
Playing now2,8812,101780
24h peak4,0613,948113
24h average2,8442,595249
7-day peak4,6894,67415
7-day average2,5623,099537
30-day peak4,8154,674141
All-time peak6,3054,7931,512
24h changeβ–² 26.5%β–Ό 8.7%β€”
7d changeβ–Ό 4.4%β–² 11.7%β€”
Total visits23.1M466.4M443.3M (20.2Γ—)
Visits (24h)384.8K438.1K53.3K
Visits (7d)2.7M3.7M1M
Favorites227.7K376.1K148.5K (1.7Γ—)
Rating79.5%92.9%β€”
Global rank (players)#526#728of 7,126
Trending score37.7-55.1β€”
CreatedJun 21, 2024Sep 25, 2025β€”
GenreObby & PlatformerShooterβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 10 days for Freeze for UGC, 10 for [FPS] Flick.

Freeze for UGC vs [FPS] Flick β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals