Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA] vs Basketball: Zero

Basketball: Zero currently leads with 8,446 concurrent players against 3,746, a 2.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Basketball: Zero at 60,316 concurrent players, versus 7,871. Momentum favours Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA]: +29.1% week over week versus +10.2% for Basketball: Zero. Lifetime, Basketball: Zero has more visits (1.1B vs 179M). Full side-by-side history for Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA] and Basketball: Zero is charted above.

Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA]
3,746
playing now
5,186 24h peak · 179M visits
VS
Basketball: Zero
8,446
playing now
8,910 24h peak · 1.1B visits

Player count history

Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA]Basketball: Zero

Head to head

Metric Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA] Basketball: ZeroDifference
Playing now3,7468,4464,700 (2.3×)
24h peak5,1868,9103,724 (1.7×)
24h average4,0417,3133,272 (1.8×)
7-day peak7,85814,8086,950 (1.9×)
7-day average3,0778,2305,153 (2.7×)
30-day peak7,85815,5257,667 (2.0×)
All-time peak7,87160,31652,445 (7.7×)
24h change 5.3% 4.6%
7d change 29.1% 10.2%
Total visits179M1.1B938.6M (6.2×)
Visits (24h)580.6K756.4K175.8K
Visits (7d)2.9M5.8M2.9M (2.0×)
Favorites250.3K2.2M1.9M (8.7×)
Rating97.2%98.3%
Global rank (players)#490#215of 7,928
Trending score112.1-42.9
CreatedJun 3, 2024Jan 3, 2025
GenreStrategySports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA], 13 for Basketball: Zero.