10 Player Flee vs +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy!
10 Player Flee currently leads with 1,950 concurrent players against 324, a 6.0Γ advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy! at 4,967 concurrent players, versus 2,598. Momentum favours 10 Player Flee: -12.6% week over week versus -70.6% for +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy!. Lifetime, 10 Player Flee has more visits (53M vs 6.5M). Full side-by-side history for 10 Player Flee and +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy! is charted above.
π 10 Player Flee
1,950
playing now
1,959 24h peak Β· 53M visits
VS
+1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy!
324
playing now
816 24h peak Β· 6.5M visits
Player count history
10 Player Flee+1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy!
Head to head
| Metric | 10 Player Flee | +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy! | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,950 | 324 | 1,626 (6.0Γ) |
| 24h peak | 1,959 | 816 | 1,143 (2.4Γ) |
| 24h average | 1,519 | 330 | 1,189 (4.6Γ) |
| 7-day peak | 2,465 | 2,222 | 243 |
| 7-day average | 1,528 | 914 | 614 (1.7Γ) |
| 30-day peak | 2,465 | 3,759 | 1,294 (1.5Γ) |
| All-time peak | 2,598 | 4,967 | 2,369 (1.9Γ) |
| 24h change | β² 13.7% | βΌ 44.6% | β |
| 7d change | βΌ 12.6% | βΌ 70.6% | β |
| Total visits | 53M | 6.5M | 46.4M (8.1Γ) |
| Visits (24h) | 117.8K | 42.1K | 75.7K (2.8Γ) |
| Visits (7d) | 1M | 808.8K | 204.5K |
| Favorites | 128K | 528.8K | 400.8K (4.1Γ) |
| Rating | 87.3% | 89.8% | β |
| Global rank (players) | #865 | #2,463 | of 7,662 |
| Trending score | -1.9 | -157.4 | β |
| Created | May 24, 2024 | May 23, 2026 | β |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | β |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β 12 days for 10 Player Flee, 10 for +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy!.